Showing posts with label commerce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commerce. Show all posts

Sunday, April 2, 2017

AppsJack Capable Communities Meetup – March 2017 – Delivering Product & Services Discussion

Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4 PM
Kirkland, WA


A few business associates and I gathered last Tuesday to talk about challenges relating to delivering products & services.  Delivering products and services is the fourth element in the APQC model.  I showed up at about 3:30 and struck up a conversation with Alan Andersen who was already there.  Alan is a leadership coach and consultant.

I’ve been fortunate to get to know Alan better over the last couple of months and it’s been a good experience for me.  Alan is well read and has so many experiences working with leaders and teams from which he can draw experiences and stories.  We sat and chatted and then a few more people showed up at our table, the Captain's Table.

Richard Webb, always a powerful and interesting force, showed up and we started to get into the meat of the delivery topic.  James Tuff, an entertaining and vivacious technology sales executive and entrepreneur, showed up and sat at the head of the table.  After long we had eight at the table including clinical psychologist and writer Steve Kubacki, an intelligent, insightful, opinionated professional and mountaineer.  Steve is great at these events in that he helps us stayed grounded, balanced and on point.  Steve regularly shares perspectives that help us see things from a more human, less business, perspective.  Tonight was no exception.

My new friend, Thomas Mercer, was sitting to my right.  I was drinking iced tea in copious amounts; I had been sick with a fever earlier in the week but was starting to spring back to life.  Spring was upon us indeed.  12 years prior, Thomas and I had finished the same master’s program at the University of Washington Foster Business School: information systems where we learned about the internet, networks, business.  And when things like Facebook were brand new.  Thomas previously ran a medical practice business that helped people with irritable bowel syndrome with diagnosis and treatment.  He explained to us his time working on that project and ho it related to the challenges of delivery.

Lee Carter, sitting to my left, is a business development manager for Ciber, a technology consulting firm with some major clients in the area, recently relocated to the Seattle area from Dallas, TX.  We were also graced by Bruce Follansbee’s presence.  Bruce is always good for conversation, putting people at ease, and book references.

One of the first things I asked about was blockchain and its relationship to delivery.  Per wikipedia:
blockchain is a distributed database that maintains a continuously growing list of ordered records called blocks. Each block contains a timestamp and a link to a previous block.[6] By design, blockchains are inherently resistant to modification of the data — once recorded, the data in a block cannot be altered retroactively. Through the use of a peer-to-peer network and a distributed timestamping server, a blockchain database is managed autonomously. Blockchains are "an open, distributed ledger that can record transactions between two parties efficiently and in a verifiable and permanent way. The ledger itself can also be programmed to trigger transactions automatically."
Richard and Thomas seemed to know quite a bit on the subject and shared what they knew with us.  There was discussion about whether the blockchains should be open or closed, transparent or not.  Issues related to security and privacy were major pivot points for our discussion.  Richard suggested that we loop in Ellen Mooney into the conversation; I guess she is an expert on the topic of digital democracy.

We were pretty much all over the map in the beginning of the discussion, going from micro levels of delivery (firm or product perspectives) up to the macro levels (global supply chains, politics and economics).  Richard talked about Amazon’s CIDC pipelines and brought up the term “logistics engine”.  Many at the table agreed that Amazon is doing very amazing things these days and that their ability to delivery and run supply chains is amazing.  For many years, Walmart, the world’s largest company by revenue in the world, has been known for its logistics and methods like “cross-docking” but it seems that Amazon, between its online presence and many innovative new products and services has begun to eat into that area of innovation.  Much is happening with Amazon.

We talked about hypothetical scenarios where Amazon could, for example, run dentist offices and use 3d printing for delivery of replacement teeth.  It didn’t seem very far-fetched.  Richard mentioned and recommended the movie Elysium which has some interesting and futuristic elements to it where people get scanned with lasers and good things happen.

I realized at some point in the bubbling conversation that the differences between delivering services and delivering products really are stark.  APQC has even recognized this issue by breaking them out into different L1 elements, making the model 13 items, no longer 12.  I think it’s important to pick one or the other for the sake of focus, clarity and conversation.  Delivering products seems a bit easier in that they are tangible and “real”, whereas delivering services seems a bit more human and ambiguous and challenging, at least to me.  Richard doesn't believe that the distinction is all that different.  Similarities between delivering services and managing customer service (the next area in the AQPC model) seem obvious and will be the target of future exploration.

We got into a pretty detailed conversation about banking, the flow of money, financial systems and corruption.  Richard is very passionate about the many issues of corruption and it helps to have Steve there for his thoughts on humanity as well.  Richard gave examples of Visa being able to run all transactions in the world on its system alone.  Steve made some interesting points about capitalism, such as:
“Capitalism is about wiping out the competition as much as possible so you can waste as much as you want.”  
Steve’s a funny guy and I don’t disagree with the point.  I know some people who definitely act that way.  For these people I know, the goal is to get really rich and make a lot of money now so they can chill out, retire and do very little later.  They aren’t trying to create economies or markets or anything, they are trying to dominate existing ones.  In a word: take.  Not my kind of verb.

Someone mentioned the book by Chris Anderson “Free: The Future of a Radical Price” and cited that it was interesting.  James Tuff shared about a new business idea he is working on in the transportation and informatics areas and we all found it interesting helping him think about how he could deliver that set of products and services.  We had a lengthy and fruitful conversation with Reba about her challenges and ideas for competing and delivering value in the very rapidly changing real estate industry.

Business is highly complex and so is delivery.  Delivery is where the rubber meets the road.  Analyzing any business from the perspective of delivery is difficult because of the natural complexity.

Stay tuned for the upcoming podcast episode on delivery when I will sit down with Josh Bosworth and Steve Kubacki to bat the topic around.


Thursday, September 29, 2016

Successfully Marketing Your Internet of Things (IoT) Idea

Recap of the 9/27/16 Kirkland, WA AppsJack Business Services Meetup

Last night we held the September AppsJack Business Services Meetup.  The meetup was held at the Big Fish Grill in Kirkland, WA and we had a good turnout.  The topic was Successfully Marketing your IoT idea and we had a great discussion on the topic.  Below are the highlights from the night.

We had a great turnout. At the event were:

  • Berry Zimmerman
  • Eric Veal
  • Richard Webb
  • Rex Chen (First time attending.  Welcome, Rex!)
  • Mike Pritchard
  • Christian Harris (First time attending.  Welcome, Christian!)
  • Andrew Sengul
  • Dominic Wong 
  • Steve Kubacki

Richard shared about three IoT products he uses (Tile https://www.thetileapp.com/, Cocoon https://cocoon.life/, Amaryllo http://www.amaryllo.eu/) and Rex told us about his home automation IoT business.  Eric talked about his past IoT experiences with InKlood.  We talked about BlueTooth beacons and entrants from players like facebook https://placetips.fb.com/beacons/ to make this technology ubiquitous.  Also mentioned were local IoT companies like Pebblebee https://pebblebee.com/ and Footmarks https://www.footmarks.com/.  Richard complained about the data from these devices being stored in China and joked about how these would be perfect tools for the government to monitor people.

Security and Privacy come up a lot in the conversation about IoT because they are such concerns.  There was a belief that the younger population had less concern about privacy.  But when it comes to security, surely we all have a concern there and want to be safe.  Some people might not know (perceive) what is and isn't safe.

We came up with five pillars of IoT.  They are:
  1. Sensors/Instrumentation
  2. Analytics and BI/Insights
  3. Data/Big Data/Storage/Persistance
  4. User Experience (UX)/Software/Telemetry
  5. Trustworthy Computing (Choice, Control, Notification)

Some of the best quotes from the evening were:

"Mind reading is a very good thing." ~ Steve Kubacki

"People want mediated relationships." ~ Christian Harris

"IoT is dead.  We have figured it out.  The next big thing is Augmented Reality.  And Pokemon Go." ~ Richard Webb

"We are seeking connection.  And meaningfulness." ~ Steve Kubacki

"I worry that IoT is selling drills, not holes." ~ Mike Pritchard

"Consciousness has changed." ~ Steve Kubacki

"What about an intranet of things?"  ~ Mike Pritchard

"My experience is not a thing." ~ Steve Kubacki

Mike P. brought up the idea about Ludites and Luditism; that they are actually a constant on the planet.  There will always people be behind the curve who want to go back to the way things were or keep things they way they are.

Dominic wondered which country was the leader in IoT.  Richard believes it is Europe.  Three of the devices that Richard has were created in France, for example.  Dominic also wondered which organization (company) was the farthest ahead on IoT.  Richard and Christian thought the government (intelligence) and also institutions like NASA where the space shuttle has IoT capability "down to the screw level".

Eric raised that he sees IoT doing a great job of providing "Just in Time" capability for many scenarios. Andrew raised the point of things NOT showing up just in time (just a bit too late).  There is risk in systems like this.  He raised the idea of Complementary vs. Competitive Technologies which was talked about on the Tim Ferriss Podcast.  The idea is that complementary technologies help humans be better even when they are not in use, whereas competitive technologies actually take some thing away (reduce our capability) after use (dependency).

"Visual Reality" as a category to include Augment, Virtual, drug-enduced and "real" reality.  The concept is probably best considered as "Sensory Reality" to encapsulate the various human senses.  The idea is that there are many channels / senses and ways to override or modify themm through technology.  So we need an abstract construct (Sensory Reality) to talk about the human's experience and the associated dyanimics / channels of that experience.

The practice / capability of "Airgapping" an environment.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gap_(networking)  In information technology, this is when information can go into an envrionment but cannot leave it.  Of course there are workarounds and ways areound this but it's an interesting concept for security at even micro scales.

The question "What are the things of IoT and what things are not the things of IoT?" was asked. The group concluded that pretty much all things were things in IoT at macro and micro scales.  Eric said that IoT is like an easy to use design tool / pattern that many people could employ by just talking about things (the world) and technology (the internet) and what's possible.  It changes, perhaps, focuses / normalizes the conversation in many ways.  Especially now that we have a platform of big data to support these ideas and scenarios.

Steve shared that there are two forms of perception: Direct and Constructive perception. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_perception

Possible topics for the next meet that were floated were "Risk, Compliance and Resiliency" (the scheduled topic), Cloud Computing (requested by Dominic), a follow up on Marketing IoT (requested by Rex), and something that ties into the pattern "Successfully Marketing your ______ idea."

For the next meetup, I will plan to capture the sound so it is possible to go back and pick out some of the great moments, exchanges and quotes.

Friday, March 14, 2014

A safe platform for entre-ployees: AppsJack Business Services Meetups

Letting employees pursue opportunities (safely) while working helps build the economy.  Here's how.

I've been thinking a lot lately about my desire to form a growing community of employees looking for "more" (excitement, opportunities, income) and mixing them with B2B service providers who are also looking for more.  I'm calling this the AppsJack Business Services Meetup.  I feel like these two groups can benefit each other in a few obvious ways if given a chance...and I'm trying to create that chance.

The employees want more income, more flexibility,  more freedom, and more growth.  For the employees participating in the group they get to meet new people, get help thinking about how to "sell" more change and things internally to their employers, and potentially get attached to fun projects and paid "finder's fee" projects that can result in passive income, helping these employees build their war chest and ability to leave their golden-handcuff situation.  The employees fear: getting bored, not making enough, being bored, being in a dead-end job forever, never realizing their dreams or full potential.

The B2B services professionals want more income, clients, capabilities, ideas, partners and freedom.  From the group they get to meet people within their target market, talk about strategies for selling within, and network with solid professionals who can advise on their businesses and help them think of and connect to new opportunities.  The B2B professionals fear: going out of business, not having enough leads, not being good enough or competitive enough, not having enough business, losing business.

Getting these people together is a win-win situation and further developing processes and services around helping them mix will be good for economic development.  Let's watch it happen!