Thursday, February 22, 2018

Lindsey Coen-Fernandez of Advantage Performance Group Shares Some Wisdom

We just caught up with Lindsey Coen-Fernandez of Advantage Performance Group.  Lindsey is an inspiring entrepreneur and leader in the area of organization development.  I went to one of Lindsey's workshops just before Christmas and had a great time.  Here's our follow up items based on the call with her:

Lindsey has an upcoming workshop she'll be putting on around the May time frame and stay tuned for that.  She believes the will likely be "The Neuroscience Behind Decision Making".  I had never heard of an "analytic network coach" and that's her specialty.  Sounds good.  I can see how helping people with decision making is a very key skill for facilitators.  I typically list options with pros and cons and a recommendation or argument, for example.  David Slight's BDN model and our causality conversation topics for this year sound similar as well.

Lindsey's target market is $100M to $500M businesses: not yet enterprises but rather well established.  She is seeking more business in the NW and has traveled extensively, globally for years.  She also produces webinars.

I plan to connect her with my friends John and Toni from the US Forest Service who run the National Facilitator Cadre when I worked with them back in 2012.  Also, I will connect her with the new Environmental subgroup that formed out of Indivisible Eastside.  Check out IE!  

Lindsey recommended a meetup to me (I shared my involvement in the Corruption subgroup for IE) called "Let's Talk About Race" from DNDA.  I commented to her how Race and Security topics coincide a great deal.  I have a list of local Security experts that I maintain it would be fun to get them together and involved.
Lindsey also recommend Andy Storch who has a podcast called Entrepreneur Hot Seat and a company called "The Hustle", which produces a daily newsletter about the latest tech and business info for millennials and are making good money with their business model.
Thanks to Lindsey to all of her great wisdom.  Check her out! 


Sunday, January 7, 2018

The yin and yang of content and its consumption

I had an interesting thing happen to me the other day that has given me some new ideas and inspiration.  I was at work and was talking to a coworker who had heard about my food blog (French dip sandwiches) and he said that it was his plan to go and eat some of the best ones.  I thought it was funny that he would do this, good for him, and I guess I was a little proud that he'd do that at all.  It will be fun to hear about his experiences and whether or not he agrees with the reviews.

But this idea of his made me realize that I was missing something.  "Recommendations" are an interesting thing.  I know the founder of this project Take Action Network and he's working with political action organizations to help them promote the political actions that people can do and make it easy for people to find, sign up for and do actions that are meaningful to them.  I run a meetup group and I want people I meet to be able to find our activities and events and sign up for them.  And I want people to be able to do this thing that Reed plans to do which is signing up for and eating a bunch of sandwiches (and then providing feedback).  In all, this leaves us with the following activities that people need to be able to do in a couple of roles.

  • Role: content creator
    • Actions
      • Make content
        • Event
          • A meetup
          • A podcast recording
        • Recommendation - like French dip sandhiches
          • People could sign up for it / say they want to do it
          • They could do it
      • Be a content consumer
  • Role: content consumer
    • Actions
      • Look for / at content
      • Sign up for things
      • Give feedback
      • Create content (become a content creator)
Yin yang, yo!

Sunday, December 31, 2017

What AppsJack Could Be

AppsJack is exploring ways to take the AppsJack Podcast and Share IRL events to the next level.  Simply, both offerings have topics, hosts and guests.  Blog posts get written and tweets get created and released.  People get invited and RSVP to participate in the events.  People take photos, have a good time and learn, they share contact info.

There's a problem in the market now between compliance (companies requiring applicants to have great resumes, educations and experiences) and capability (what a candidate can actually do).   Our employers are screwed up right now with this issue and are mismanaged, too.  There are many talented candidates out there who are finding it hard to win jobs.  And there are many talented consultants who aren't connecting with potential paid clients for a variety of reasons.

Hosts, organizers, writers and guests of the AppsJack Podcast and Share IRLs are good for:

  • Learning from others
  • Showing skills
  • Practicing skills
  • Demonstrating excellence and expertise
  • Growing an audience
  • Make your resume and story more compelling and relevant
  • Promoting ideas and individuals
AppsJack is committed to helping members of the community grow, learn and develop.  AppsJack creates free events and opportunities for ambitious individuals to get out there and change the world.  Join us today.

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Cool Event: Culture Counts - Event Recap

I attended an excellent, uplifting event with my friend Hsuan-Hua Chang on Tuesday called "Culture Counts".  It was led by a very fascinating woman, XXX.  The leader was from South Africa originally and has lived in 15 countries.  She has gathered many principles and practices that she now shares with organizations to help them create environments and experiences that help people be their best and perform optimally.  It was an inspirational topic and very professionally led.

When I showed up at the place in Ballard after work, I was amazed by the impressiveness of the facility: it was someone's house that they had rented, but by no means your typical, run of the mill house at all.  The inside of the structure was large and sprawling and open and lovely.  It was in an industrial neighborhood but once you were inside you felt like you were in a womb.  The large, open structure was expertly decorated and arranged with beautiful artwork and laid out in a very interesting and intentional way.  Our hosts were kind and provided us with hot cocoa and warm greetings on entry; it was the week before Christmas indeed and a large Christmas tree greeted us as well. 

About 20 of us arrived and the session began as we sat around a large table called the culture table.  We were led and asked to write down three things on post-it notes with colored Sharpies: 1) the first word that came to our minds when we entered the space 2) the reason we were there 3) three things that spoke most to us when we walked around the room and took in the experiences.  We were asked to share our findings with peers and soon learned that each of our reactions, perceptions and beliefs were quite unique and different from those around us.  For example, Marc shared that he liked the exposed brass pipes which I had looked right past and still didn't mind.  Another person shared that they loved a jellyfish painting that did nothing for me.  I stated that I liked the kitchen, the velvet couches and the open space.  A third person, Russell, explained that he felt dwarfed when we walked into the space but my feeling was the exact opposite: it made me feel great since I am quite tall.  We learned that we were all quite different and experiencing things in very different ways; we were diverse.

The leader explained some of what was happening: she said that the soul of a building is not the artifacts or thing itself but rather what we, the people, bring into it: our senses, observations, selves and stories. 

It was a great event and we had a lot of good nuggets: culture could be the corresponding personality of a place or group.  We read stats about just how important happy workers are and the many negative consequences of unhappy workers.  We learned that culture always has a purpose or goal.  A culture is the soul of an organization or group.  A few questions came up for me: Is culture the sum total of the intangible benefits and beliefs of an org?  Is culture the compensation, benefits and value that people receive from a group that come for free, organically and naturally?  The goal of creating and influencing a good culture is to have people become the best versions of themselves and sustainably do the best work of their lives.  Some degree of bottoms-up, organic, authentic culture is required and we talked about the idea of leading from the edge.  The idea of an organization's edge is important and is a major place from which change can and does happen.  Yes, organizations do indeed have centers and tops and power structures but also, each person, on the edge may be armed with the same tools and power and ability to influence people and shine a light on opportunities and possibilities.  Taking steps can be risky and sometimes we just need to plunge in.  We can take calculated, planned, intentional  steps that have fallback plans, too.  Or we can just say screw it, go for it and see what happens.

We broke out into small groups to discuss ratings we created of the cultures in our organizations.  In my small group, there was one area where we all agreed was weak in each of our areas: managers.  And we talked about the role of managers and the org for creating a space that feels safe and inspiring. 

We watched a video about a non-profit in Seattle that helped the homeless and then met the star of the video, the founder of the non-profit and got to hear more about her story. 

In all, it was a wonderful, well-planned and executed event.  Thanks to Hsuan-Hua and all the others I met.  I look forward to getting to know the speaker more as well.

Monday, December 4, 2017

AppsJack TECH DRIVERS Debate Highlights - November 2017

We had a motley crew of 16 awesome people at the kickoff of AppsJack Season 2, where our topic is causality and business dependency networks (BDNs). 

Image result for the matrix

We were led on Tuesday evening by management consultant David Slight who is basically awesome. David came very well prepared with handouts for the guests and a meetup host sign-up sheet.  David led us in topic 1 of 12: TECH DRIVERS. 

The dialog went far and wide and was fascinating.   The discussion touched on:
  • The 3rd Industrial Revolution wiki
  • 5G mobile networks wiki
  • Humans are Under Rated video
  • GM says it is leaving the automotive industry - Richard Webb statement, needs source
  • Bonini's Paradox - contribution by newcomer Lucas Parker - "explains the difficulty in constructing models or simulations that fully capture the workings of complex systems (such as the human brain)."  wiki
  • "Things don't just happen, they happen for a reason."  ~ David Slight quote.
  • Drivers are things we can't change.
  • Richard spoke about the technology having been ready and done for five years but regulation and its impacts are the things holding its implementation back.
The main lessons that I took away as a facilitator and leader of this group were A) we need to tell people to create a small team of at least one other person so they are engaged and can break out if needed (and not just be quiet or disengaged in the discussion).  Having small groups is one thing that makes us identify as part of the big group.

Join us for our next gathering in a couple of weeks when we'll take the HUMAN side of the DRIVERS debate.  Details and RSVP here.

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

The Plan for 2017 and 2018

By David Slight

We'll Talk About Causality and Business Dependency Networks. For a YEAR!

Given our mission to talk about business and technology and learn from diverse perspectives of the group members, we are suggesting and going forth with this self-organizing charter for the coming year. For each of the six BDN perspectives, we will look first at the technology followed by the human perspective. So our calendar for the year looks like the following:

The WHY

November: 
Drivers Tech: what is coming for robotics, automation and futurism

December: 
Drivers Humans: how to evangelize the humanist and people perspectives
Drivers explain why an investment is being made. These are the reasons that senior managers believe will have an impact on the business in a given time frame, yet they are outside the direct control of the organization. A driver requires responses from the business. Drivers can be external (listed first), something in the larger market environment, or internal, an improvement initiative or mandate generated within the organization by senior management.

January: 
Outcomes Tech: What technology and automation do we want to adopt? How far are we willing to let the robots go?

February: 
Outcomes Humans: Define the outcomes we as humans want to achieve.
The outcomes define the end point, or the state at which an investment is aimed.  They are the agreed-upon achievement targets  that help address the drivers. Outcomes are derived from the envisioned changes indicated by the drivers, and help define the benefits that are to be expected.

March: 
Benefits Tech: What benefits can automation and technology provide? How do we measure the benefits?

April:
Humans: Benefits: Who should get the benefits? Large tech corporations or everyone? The developer or sales?
Benefits describe what will happen in the business to help achieve the outcomes. These are advantages to an organization’s stakeholders that can be realized by business changes. Every benefit stream must have an owner who is part of the analysis process. The expected benefits types must be determined, along with how they will be measured. The organization’s key performance indicators (KPIs) are a good source of measures. Inclusion of quantitative measures is preferred, if a reliable number can be obtained from the customer.

The WHAT

May: 
Changes Tech: Where is the tipping point when AI starts to think for itself?

June: 
Changes Humans: Can people change, can culture change?
Business changes are new and permanent ways of working within the organization to realize benefits.  The changes come in three forms: 1) Doing new things, 2) doing things better, and 3) stopping counterproductive things.  These can be shown at a high level in several ways, depending on the organization’s preference: as a business process to be changed, a description of the changes to be made, or as organizational capabilities or functional units.

The HOW

July: 
Capabilities Tech:  What capabilities can we rely on from technology?

September: 
Capabilities Humans: What are the essential human capabilities that should be retained and nurtured?
Capabilities are that must be at the required level of maturity in order to support the desired business changes. Multiple capabilities may be required to change an individual process, and some changes may affect more than one process. Training, implementations of new standards, policies, and procedures, or acquisitions and reorganizations are included in this category.

October: 
Enablers Tech: Which technologies are ready for prime time?

November: 
Enablers Humans: What can technology still not enable?  
Enabling technologies  provide the lowest level answers to the question of how  business changes will be achieved.  The items in this column are the IT systems, projects, or product features that will support needed changes. They can support changes in a business process, as well as the introduction of new technology or the work required in a project .

WRAP UP

December: Discuss our charter for 2019

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

AppsJack Group to Change World in 2018


It was a nice Fall day and the biggest and best turnout to date happened for the AppsJack group last night at Big Fish Grill in Kirkland.


Alan Andersen, Andrew Sengul, Berry Zimmerman, Christian Harris, Dominic Wong, Dr. Tom Louwers, Ele Munjeli, Eric Veal, Jean Bishop, Jehan Bharucha, Kifaya Dawud, Mark Mueller-Eberstein, Megan Gaiser, Thomas Mercer, Mike Dodd, Reba Haas, David Slight, Sriram Sabesan, Steve Kubacki, Susan Stringer, Richard Webb
 Here was our agenda for the evening:

  • Retrospective and feedback
    • Success stories and new relationships from the group
    • Best parts
    • Worst parts
    • Things to change
    • Competition - what takes you away from it?
  • Purpose and identity - who are we and why are we here, what's our name?
  • Schedule and frequency, meeting types and formats, size of meetings
  • 2018 Topics
  • Ongoing relationship to APQC?
  • Organizers / board
  • Expansion, scope, milestones, organization
  • Fees
  • Partnerships, sponsorship, affiliations
  • Podcast
  • Subgroups and committees
  • Technology, tools and online presence
  • Venues, Seattle

Here are the main action items and to do's from the meeting:

  • Plan in detail
  • Change name
  • Remove cap of # attendees
  • Postpone start by one hour
  • Change topics from APQC to BDN + Robots + Humans in 2018
  • Get owners/hosts/leads for each 2018 meeting 
  • Look into online tech that would help
  • Book reviews
  • Pre-reading and recommendations
  • More detailed profiles for each member - stickers or badges based on the APQC model
  • Patreon platform for contributions
  • E2B as sponsor?
  • Consider and help each other develop what "product" each of us is creating
  • Opportunities to share stories and successes annually - a gala
  • Leverage what is unique and beneficial about Seattle over other tech hubs like Silicon Valley - be unique, different and stand out.  We are practical and not Hollywood.  We are loggers and fishermen.

And here are detailed notes, outcomes and decisions from the meeting.  Join us at a gathering soon!
  • Retrospective and feedback
    • Lots of good feedback here.  People were here for:
      • "High level thinking"
      • Diversity of opinions and perspectives (learning)
      • Academic, experienced and educated tone
      • Consistent high quality
      • Stimulation
      • Idea sharing
      • Cross-domain thinking and experiences, feedback and ideas
      • Random networking
      • Stories and experiences are illuminating
    • Successes people have had
      • Steve and Andrew met through the group and are collaborating
      • Christian has met a ton of new people through it
      • Thomas met Bruce Follansbee who has opened many doors
  • Purpose and identity - who are we and why are we here, what's our name?
    • Brainstorm on names, taglines and descriptions
      • Descriptions and Taglines
        • Thought provoking
        • "It's all connected"
        • Making Meaning and Money
      • Names
        • Think tank
        • "Talk Tank"
        • "Food for Thought"
        • Talk, Inc.
        • Rethinking business
        • Humanist Technology
        • Making Business Human
        • Saving Business
        • Business Humanity²
        • Human Tank
        • Business Reconnected
        • Business & People Reconnected
        • H2H: Human to Human
        • Unf*ck Business
        • Human-Centered Business
        • Business Renaissance: Unf*cking Business - This was the most popular (or at least the funniest).  We will continue to think about the best name.
  • Schedule and frequency, meeting types and formats, size of meetings
    • 4th Tuesdays will continue
    • 5 PM official start preferred but people welcome to show up earlier
    • No limit on number of guests
    • "Owners" / organizers for each meeting - sign up sheet
  • 2018 Topics and themes
    • Ele: "The automation apocalypse"
    • AI vs. Automation
    • Robot-Human Interface
    • Steve offered this three-pronged approach:
      • Economics
      • Business
      • Praxix / Products (concrete)
    • Zodiac signs - Andrew Sengul
    • The BDN model with David Slight: Drivers, Objectives, Benefits, Changes, Capabilities, Enablers and then switch between the tech/robot perspective and the human perspective.  
  • Ongoing relationship to APQC?
    • Nothing will be overt.  Could come up again here and there but it's over for now.  RIP APQC!
  • Organizers / board
    • Not needed.  Tap individuals as needed.  Build small, focused teams as needed.  Keep organic.
  • Expansion, scope, milestones, organization
    • Happy to keep it as an Eastside only event for now.
    • Eric will talk to Michael Dodd and the Product Camp people about expansion of a group in Seattle.
  • Fees
    • Keep it free / optional.
    • Can charge through meetup.  Runs the risk of turning people away; traction is preferred to profit.
    • Some guests are willing to contribute capital.
  • Partnerships, sponsorship, affiliations
    • Keep this standalone for now to maximize flexibility.
  • Podcast
    • Yes, the podcast is good.  Keep it tied to the meetup on the same schedule.  Add 1:1 podcasting capability through Janis' Machala or Josh Golden's contacts.
  • Subgroups and committees
    • No need for this right now.  Will form as necessary.
    • Technology subgroup: Ele, Andrew, Eric
  • Technology, tools and online presence
    • No agreement here.
    • An online discussion forum could be good.
    • Will talk with Andrew and Ele to decide on a direction.
  • Venues, Seattle
    • Big Fish Grill fine for now.
    • Reba and Berry may have some functional options if we want to switch it up.